Cloud breaches are never one misconfiguration. They’re a chain.
MCR finds every account, subscription and workload — including the ones nobody told you about — then closes the combinations that actually reach your data.
90 secondsNo signup to startRead-only, no agents
The problem
A public endpoint is a medium. A public endpoint with a role that can read secrets is a breach.
Cloud security tools are very good at counting findings. Counting is not the problem.
// the accounts you don’t see
Shadow subscriptions spun up without telling anyone
A team needed an environment quickly. It is internet-facing, unhardened, and absent from your inventory — which means absent from your monitoring, your patching and your reporting.
// 5% of granted permission
Entitlement sprawl nobody measures against usage
In most estates we assess, under 5% of granted cloud permissions are ever used. The other 95% is the difference between one compromised workload and estate-wide access.
// the backlog that reads as progress
Thousands of findings, flat exposure
Severity-ranked lists send teams to close hundreds of isolated mediums while the handful of toxic combinations that reach data stay open for months.
The programme
What MCR actually does
Continuous posture management with remediation attached — across every provider in your estate.
Complete, reconciled cloud inventory
Agentless discovery across AWS, Azure, GCP and Microsoft 365, including the accounts outside your CMDB.
- Multi-cloud asset and identity discovery
- Shadow account and orphaned resource detection
- Internet-facing exposure mapping
- Data-store discovery and sensitivity context
- Container, serverless and Kubernetes coverage
Toxic combinations, not isolated findings
Attack-path modelling that treats exposure as a chain, because attackers do.
- Attack-path and blast-radius modelling
- Cloud entitlement analysis against actual usage (CIEM)
- Misconfiguration detection against CIS and provider benchmarks
- Secret and key exposure detection
- Vulnerability context on reachable workloads
Close the path, not the ticket
Prioritised closure with your engineering teams, plus prevention so the same defect stops recurring.
- Ranked fixes with modelled exposure reduction
- Guided or managed remediation
- Infrastructure-as-code and pipeline policy guidance
- Right-sizing of over-permissioned roles
- Verified closure on rescan
A cloud exposure score that trends
Monthly re-measurement and reporting that survives contact with a board or an auditor.
- Monthly cloud exposure re-score
- Time-to-remediate measured and reported
- Per-business-unit or per-account breakdown
- Evidence set for ISO 27001 and Essential Eight
At a glance
What’s included
The commercial and technical shape of the programme, before you talk to anyone.
| Cloud coverage | AWS, Azure, GCP and Microsoft 365 — multi-account and multi-tenant |
| Deployment | Agentless, read-only connection. No workload installation |
| Baseline | Cloud Exposure Assessment — full estate scan and scored report |
| Cadence | Continuous posture monitoring, monthly re-score, quarterly executive report |
| Remediation | Guided or managed closure, with IaC prevention guidance |
| Platform | Delivered on CyberDNA’s cloud exposure platform, FIKS |
| Guarantee | 90% reduction in measured cloud exposure score in 90 days — see terms |
This is a good fit if…
- Multi-account AWS or Azure estate, or a fast-growing single-provider one
- Cloud and security owned by different teams with different priorities
- Findings backlog that keeps growing while risk stays flat
- Compliance or customer-security-review pressure on cloud posture
If none of these describe you, MCR probably is not your priority — and we would rather tell you that than sell it. Run the free assessment on a different surface and see where your score is actually worst.
The fair questions
No. MCR connects agentlessly with read-only permissions. Nothing is deployed into workloads, so there is no performance impact and no change-freeze conflict.
Most CSPM deployments produce findings nobody has capacity to close. MCR adds the two things that actually move risk: attack-path prioritisation so you know which handful matter, and the remediation capacity to close them. If your CSPM is already driving verified closure and a falling exposure trend, you do not need us.
Yes — SaaS posture for M365 is in scope, including over-sharing and identity configuration. Where email is the primary concern, MER is the better-fitting programme and the two are commonly run together.
Find out where you stand on cloud — in 90 seconds.
Eight questions, a score, and your top three exposure factors. If you want the real number, the full assessment reads your actual environment: read-only, no agents, 48 hours to a report.
90 secondsNo signup to startNo agents, read-onlyNo obligation